Nothing and Everything

2010.01.18

Daybreakers

Filed under: TV/Movies — kevenker @ 5:11 pm

I saw Daybreakers last Friday evening with Stacy. It’s an OK movie. It is a vampire movie, but with an interesting twist that makes things a bit more interesting. In this world, the vampires have “won” and nearly everybody is a vampire. Unfortunately, the vampires drank too much human blood and now human blood is scarce and there is no substitute! If vampires go too long without human blood, they turn “feral” and end up looking like giant, ugly bats with an IQ to match their new bat-like looks. Needless to say, the vampires really don’t want to end up like that!

Then a chance encounter with the main character vampire Edward Dalton (Ethan Hawke) with some humans (for which, we find out he has some sympathy) leads him to a human who was a former vampire (Willem Dafoe). How did this happen??

So without hashing out the whole movie I will say that the movie is kind of campy in spots. Of course you have scenes of vampires attacking the few hapless humans left and sucking their blood and all. I really liked how they portrayed the vampires technologically adapting to the sunlight so that they could operate, more or less, all the time. The basic script idea was cool and overall the script seemed “reasonable”. The campiness sort of spoiled it for me, though about an hour in I sort of gave in and rolled with it.

I liked the concept of the ending but I didn’t like the actual execution of the ending, expecting a sort of “reverse pandemic” to happen to the vampires, which I thought would have been both slightly ironic and more satisfying. Either that, or a guerilla-warfare type of ending with contaminated blood.

In some ways I’d like to give it a 6/10 but I feel it really only deserves a 5/10. So that’s what it shall be! If you like slightly campy, yet overall serious movies with vampires in them, you’ll probably want to see it at some point.

2010.01.09

First bike ride of ‘10

Filed under: Daily Stuff — kevenker @ 8:44 pm

I did my first bike ride of 2010 today. Things went pretty well. It was only 39.2 miles, so not a long ride. It was sort of strange, physically-speaking. My strength felt really good but I could tell my cardio was a bit off. The hills we climbed were pretty easy.

I didn’t have a chance to get ready until the morning so I was struggling to get all my gear together. Fortunately, I had managed to put everything mostly away in the proper locations so finding all my gear wasn’t too much trouble. :) I even managed to show up reasonably on time! Only problem was that my bike computer battery was almost dead, so, although it recorded my trip, I couldn’t see anything on the screen while I was riding!

The weather was quite cold and threatening rain but by the end it was sunny with clear blue skies, so things turned out rather pleasantly.

39.2 miles, 3:06:33, 12.6 mph avg. ~1500 calories.

2010.01.01

New Years 2010

Filed under: Daily Stuff — kevenker @ 4:01 pm

Had a fairly relaxing New Years celebration. Started out the day rather slowly with a few chores and such. Stacy and I finally got rolling around 1530 so we could catch a movie. I had something I wanted to mail so we made a quick detour and got my mail sent before heading to Alderwood to watch Sherlock Holmes. It’s a new, “modern” take on the classic detective. It was good.

Afterwards, we had our final meal of 2009 at Macaroni Grill. I had a steak and Stacy had chicken. We dropped by the house to change into slightly more dressy clothes before heading up to Arlington to my friend Hayden’s place for a fairly quiet New Year’s celebration. I tried to moderate my drinking a bit so I would feel OK the next day. I was mostly successful. :) There were only about 10 people there so for the most part, we sat around the dining room table talking, drinking and eating snacks.

Around 0200 some of the guests decided they wanted to shoot off some fireworks which displeased our host. I was not involved in that. :P Stacy and I headed home around 0230 but we stopped off at the Tulalip Casino to watch people gamble. Neither of us felt rich enough to actually gamble! :) We were there for probably close to an hour. I was surprised how busy the place was from 0300-ish to 0400-ish. Quite a lot of people!

We finished off the evening by stopping off at Shari’s for some breakfast as we both were feeling a bit hungry!

Got to bed about 0600! Boy was I glad to be in bed! :)

I still need to get my New Year’s resolutions done. The only concrete ones I have right now are not drinking for 4 weeks (weight loss) and blogging (as opposed to Facebooking) at least once a week. The first one will be easy, the 2nd will be more challenging!

I also want to get down to 10-12% body fat, but I haven’t yet figured out the particulars of that (timeframe, etc.) Right now I’m running around 16-20% B.F (fat calipers say 16% and Zone waist measurements say around 20% ) So I have a few pounds to lose at this point. I weighed in at 203 this morning!! :( It’s not all bad though. I’ve gained between 5 and 10 lbs of lean body mass. The problem is that I started to work on gaining muscle with a bit too high of BF. From my readings, it is much better to start gaining when you’re in the 10% BF range than 15%, which is where I started. Consequently, I’ve added about 1 lb of fat per 1lb of muscle, which is OK, but does mean I’m running about 15 lbs heavier than I started out in July with my weightlifting program. I’ve got another 4 weeks before finishing my current program (Men’s Health: The Book of Muscle beginner program), at which point I will shift into a more serious weight-loss mode.

I should probably shoot for 10% BF but that goal seems a bit daunting to me. I suppose yet another reason to shoot for it, though. :) At my current lean mass (~166lbs) 10% BF would put me at around 182 lbs. I hit a low of 187 in July right around STP, so that’s just a bit less that where I was recently. However, it will be trickier to lot lose any lean mass so I will have to be very careful (read: really on top of my diet).

Anyway, that’s probably way more detail than anybody ever wanted to know. :)

10 predictions for 2010 and beyond

Filed under: Society/Politics — kevenker @ 3:28 pm

http://www.sixwise.com/Newsletters/2010/January/01/Top-Predictions-for-2010.htm?source=nl

This site usually does health-related stuff, so it was interesting to see what they said. Housing price declines, stock market crashes and currency crises are all in the cards according to this article. From what I’ve been reading in the past year, I tend to agree. We’re not out of the woods yet, economically speaking.

Happy New Decade!

Filed under: Daily Stuff — kevenker @ 12:01 am

Happy New Year everybody.

Whew! I’m glad the “naughts” (as I heard on the radio a few days ago) are over. Hopefully the teens will be better, but unfortunately, I think we’ve got some more pain before things settle down. I think the first few years of the teens are going to be doozies. So batten down your hatches and get ready for a wild ride!!

I am going to try to get back to posting here on at least a semi-regular basis. Facebook sucks up too much time! And I don’t even post much to Facebook.

2009.12.31

Sprinting improves endurance

Filed under: Daily Stuff — kevenker @ 10:04 am

http://drmirkin.com/public/ezine112909.html

Why Sprinting Improves Endurance

November 29, 2009

Jens Bangsbo of the University of Copenhagen has shown that if you want to run, cycle or swim faster at any distance, you have to train at a pace that is almost as fast as you can move (Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2009). He asked competitive distance runners to reduce their mileage by 25 percent, and to run 8 to 12 30-second sprints 2-3 times a week, with some additional 0.6-0.8 mile sprints 1 or 2 times per week, for 6 to 9 weeks. The control group of runners continued their regular training program, and showed no improvement. The sprint group improved both their 3K (1.8 mile) and 10K (6 mile) race times by more than three percent (more than a minute in the 10-K race). Half of them ran their best times ever, even though many had been racing for more than five years.

Two years ago, Dr. Bangsbo did ground-breaking research supporting the leading theory that exhaustion of the sodium- potassium pump is the major cause of muscle fatigue during exercise (Acta Physiologica, November 2007). In this new study, he shows how sprint training improves a muscle’s capacity to pump potassium back inside muscle cells during exercise, which helps all athletes run or cycle faster in competition, even in endurance events such as marathons and multi-day bicycle races.

A muscle can contract only if it has an electrical charge across the muscle cell membrane. This electrical charge comes mainly from having sodium primarily outside the cell and potassium primarily inside the cell. This higher concentration of sodium outside the cell and higher concentration of potassium inside the cell is maintained by sodium-potassium pumps in the cell membranes. The pumps get their energy from an enzyme called ATPase.

When the brain sends electrical signals along nerves leading to each muscle fiber, sodium moves rapidly into muscle cells followed by an equivalent movement of potassium out of the cells, causing the muscle fibers to contract. However, the sodium- potassium pump cannot pump potassium back into the cells as fast as the rapidly-contracting muscle cells move potassium out.

Dr. Bangsbo showed that during rapid contractions, muscle cells lose potassium so fast that there is a doubling of the potassium outside cells in less than a minute. The electrical charge between the inside and outside of muscle cells is reduced, and they contract with much less force until finally they cannot contract at all. During continuous contractions of muscles, the loss of force from a muscle contraction is directly proportional to the amount of potassium that goes outside the cells.

Over time, repeated muscle contractions themselves will markedly increase the ability of the sodium-potassium pump to pump potassium into cells. The greater the force on a muscle during training, the more effectively the potassium pump can pump potassium back into muscles, resulting in greater endurance for the athlete. So intense training is necessary for endurance, and any training strategy that increases the number of intense workouts will give the athlete greater endurance.

You can also increase the effectiveness of the sodium potassium pumps by being excited before a race (which increases adrenalin), and by eating before and during races (which raises insulin levels). Hormones known to strengthen the sodium- potassium pump, and therefore to increase endurance, include adrenalin, insulin, insulin-like growth factor I, calcitonins, amylin, thyroid, testosterone and cortisones.

How to apply this information to your training program:

You cannot gain maximum endurance just with continuous exercise. To improve your potassium-sodium pumps, you have to put maximum force on your muscles. This requires some form of interval training. (CAUTION: Intense exercise can kill a person with blocked arteries to the heart; check with your doctor before increasing the intensity of your program.)

Intervals are classified as short intervals that take fewer than 30 seconds and do not generate significant amounts of lactic acid; and long intervals that take more than two minutes and generate large amounts of lactic acid. The longest you can exercise with maximal force on muscles is about 30 seconds. All competitive athletes should do some sort of 30-second interval. Nobody knows how often you have to do this, but most runners and cyclists do short intervals once or twice a seek. You probably should do long intervals also. However, applying near-maximal force on muscles for more than 30 seconds causes considerable muscle damage, so you have to allow muscles to recover by doing slow training for one or two days afterwards.

Since short intervals do not accumulate much lactic acid, you can do a large number of repetitions during a single workout. Long intervals cause a tremendous amount of muscle damage, so you can only do a few long intervals during a workout. A sound endurance program should include a lot of slow miles, one or two workouts with many short intervals, and probably at least one workout that includes a few long intervals each week.

***********************************************

Dear Dr. Mirkin: How long should I rest between intervals?

Athletes learn their ideal interval rest durations through trial and error. They may want to rest until their pulses drops enough for them to feel comfortable, or for them to be able to slow breathing rate down towards normal, or wait until their muscles lose soreness and they feel fresh. They do not wait for complete recovery of resting heart or breathing rate, or complete recovery from muscle soreness. Runners and cyclists often use heart rate monitors or a clock to determine when they will do their next interval. Weight lifters usually wait for their bodies to “feel” recovered. You can use whatever yardstick for recovery you like, but if it takes you longer than two days to recover after an interval workout, you are probably exercising too intensely, doing too many repetitions, or not taking a long enough interval rest.

***********************************************

2009.09.22

The Day the Earth Stood Still

Filed under: TV/Movies — kevenker @ 11:48 am

I saw updated version of The Day The Earth Stood Still the other day. It was tolerable, but just tolerable. This time, aliens come to earth to warn the pesky humans to take better care of the earth! No warnings about being so warlike (as in the original). The spearhead of this effort is Klaatu (Keanu Reeves), whom the directors/producers cleverly made an alien who is “born” into human-form, thus in one swoop explaining away his incredibly wooden performance!

Jennifer Connelly gamely tries to save the movie, playing Helen Benson, a xenobiologist (can’t remember her real title) of sorts who is brought on board by the U.S. Government to study Klaatu. Realizing that the gov’t sucks, she helps Klaatu escape and they run around trying not to get caught while Klaatu explains to Helen that the best way to clean up the earth is to destroy it. Well not quite true. Just destroy all the humans and other living creatures on the planet. But don’t worry, they collected a few samples so they can reseed the planet afterwards!

Yes, the best the super-intelligent, super-capable aliens can think of is to destroy the Earth to save it. What are we, in some sort of strange Viet-Nam era paradox? The reasoning is strange: our planet is one of the few capable of supporting complex life. Humans are mucking up the earth. Thus, humans must die. Of course humans might be considered the most complex form of life on the planet. Sentient and all that. So what is the point to killing all the humans? So that some other creature can evolve to be intelligent and probably also come close to destroying the environment so that the aliens can destroy them too? So what is the point of “saving” the planet for complex life?

I think the method of destroying the earth was chosen so that they could employ some computer animation people and do cool scenes of semi-trucks being disintegrated or a football stadium being disintigrated by the pseudo-nanotechnological equivalent of locusts. The things actually had wings! It seems like it would have been a lot easier to simply create a virus that would make everybody sick and die. Of course, you could create a virus to reduce fertility rates so that the population declines and not just wipe out every living thing on the planet! Or… I could spend much more time picking apart the movie and the ludicrous plot, but I’m on a lunch break and have to get back to work! :)

I thought most of the acting was pretty decent. Everybody acted like they were in a good movie. Too bad they weren’t! And really, its not like the movie made we want to stab my eyes out or anything. It’s just a dumb movie.

Watch this movie late at night when nothing else is on! 3/10

2009.09.21

Get your Vitamin D!

Filed under: Health — kevenker @ 10:00 am

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/51913.php

This was forwarded to me by a friend of mine. I’ve seen other articles that have, dosage-wise, said the same thing: take 4000 – 5000 IU per day of Vitamin D in the wintertime to avoid the flu.

Give the various nasty flus that are running around this year, and the dangers of getting vaccinated, I think it is more important than ever to make sure you have adequate Vitamin D levels. It is so cheap these days that it’s almost criminal not to take enough! As with anything, do your research before taking something but I am taking 4000IU/day right now and will increase to 5000 IU/day when the weather gets really bad and I no longer see the sun!

2009.09.15

Sunshine Cleaning

Filed under: TV/Movies — kevenker @ 12:49 pm

I saw Sunshine Cleaning the other day. I liked the movie. It’s not a great movie, but it’s a good movie. The essential story is single mom with troubled kid needs more money and starts a small business to get more money. The background story is that the single mom, Rose Lorkowski (Amy Adams) is a former head cheerleader whose life has gone all wrong. She is still seeing her high-school beau on the side though he’s married to somebody else! She never went to college so is cleaning houses for a living. Her sister Norah (Emily Blunt) is in even worse shape! A series of events leads Rose and Norah to end up doing crime scene cleanup. The money is good if you can stand the odor!

So I thought the plot was decent, no complaints there. There were many funny scenes along with some painful ones (but in a good way – they were meant to be painful not accidentally painful) and heartfelt ones. Once scene I thought was good was one that occurred during a baby shower that Rose attended. The mom was a former high-school cheerleader and they had lost contact. I think the idea was that Rose pretty much lost contact with everybody from high-school as she didn’t want to be found. Rose’s meeting was accidental: she was cleaning her former friend’s house.

Anyway, at this baby-shower, Rose explains what she does. At first she talks very superficially, but even that sounds very “blue-collar” to her (Rose’s friend was upper middle class along with all of her friends). So she digs deeper and begins to talk about how she helps people by taking care of something unpleasant. As she talks, you can see the lightbulb go off in her own head. Her words became meaning. It was a good scene.

The only really odd thing about the movie was the color. It sort of ‘wandered’ a bit; like they had some sort of film development issue.

I’m going to give this a 6/10. I liked it, it’s watchable. I don’t think it rates higher for me personally because, in the end, I don’t really think about the characters. With some movies, you sort of wonder what happened to the characters after the movie ends. I guess, to me, that means the characters are more real in some sense.

2009.08.27

Inglorious Basterds

Filed under: Daily Stuff, TV/Movies — kevenker @ 12:01 pm

I saw Inglorious Basterds this weekend. I liked the movie. It is long, but I don’t realize it was so long until after the movie was over and I looked at my watch! Inglorious Basterds is sort of a fictional historical rewrite of WWII. In it, a small group of elite Jewish killers were dropped into France to extract their revenge on the “nat-sis”, as Lt. Aldo Raine (Bradd Pitt) would say it.

Though there is some gore (scalpings and some baseball bats to heads) for the most part, the movie is almost what you might call a spy thriller. There isn’t really all that much gore, but when there is, there’s a lot of it!

The start of the movie is awesome. It involves a long and increasingly tense scene as the ” Jew Hunter”, as he is nicknamed is Col. Hans Landa  and fantastically, creepily played by Christoph Waltz, interviews the farmer to see where a particular Jewish family went. This sets up one of the characters for the future.

There are 3 things I especially liked about the movie. First is the classic Quentin Tarantino dialogue. Great dialogue and for the most part and it sounds like something a real person would have said. Second, Tarantino isn’t afraid to let a scene and its dialogue go on for a long time as long as things build and build and build. So many movies these days are like music vidoes that jump frenetically from one scene to the next. Third, I liked the extensive use of foreign language in the film. Yeah, you have to read sub-titles a lot, but it’s cool to have a popular, big-budget movie that makes you work for a it just a little. I was often a bit disappointed when they switched to English, though in one case, there was a diabolical explanation as to why English was chosen.

I thought the choice of actors was quite good too. Christoph Waltz as Col. Hans Landa was by far the runaway pick. Everybody else was good, but Mr. Waltz ate up his scenes! But nobody seemed out of place. Brad Pitt’s character was good and fun, but, though he’s featured prominently in the ads, he wasn’t on screen all that much.

8/10

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.